The Threat of Theocracy: Islam and World Domination

Make no mistake. Muslims seek to dominate the world.

I’m not simply using hyperbole in that statement or exaggerating the threat that Islam poses to freedom and secular choices. Various cults of Islam are devout in their intent to spread their cults to all of humanity and publically state these intents. Moreover, it is written in their mythology, which they accept as unquestioning truth, that Muslims should seek to share their delusion with the entire world.

Mawlana Abul Alla Mawdudi, the founder of Pakistan’s fundamentalist movement, has said:

Islam is not a normal religion like the other religions in the world, and Muslim nations are not like normal nations. Muslim nations are very special because they have a command from Allah to rule the entire world and to be over every nation in the world. Islam is a revolutionary faith that comes to destroy any government made by man. Islam doesn’t look for a nation to be in better condition than another nation. Islam doesn’t care about land or who owns the land. The goal of Islam is to rule the entire world and submit all of mankind to the faith of Islam. Any nation or power in this world that tries to get in the way of that goal Islam will fight and destroy. In order for Islam to fulfill that goal, Islam can use every power available every way it can be used to bring worldwide revolution. This is jihad.

Of course, so-called moderate Muslims will object and say that “jihad” simply means “struggle” and that each Muslim “struggles” to bring peace, harmony, etc. Unfortunately, theirs is a voice, even if it is a majority, that isn’t heard nor is it loud. It is, after all, the Koran itself that teaches what jihad is truly about in passages like those found in Surah 8:

When you fight with disbelievers, do not retreat. Those who do will go to hell (8:15-16); those that the Muslims killed were not really killed by them. It was Allah who did the killing (8:17); Fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah (8:39); and, don’t let the disbelievers think they can escape. They are your enemy and the enemy of Allah (8:59-60).

Passages like these are what inform the violent interpretations of “jihad” with Muslims; but what of global domination? What justifies this evangelism of terror in the eyes of the Muslim? Further looks at Koranic verses is revealing:

Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you but do not transgress limits…And slay them wherever ye catch them. And turn them out from where they have turned you out; for persecution is worse than slaughter; But fight them not at the sacred Mosque unless they first fight you there; But if they fight you, slay them. Such is the reward of those who reject faith. But if they cease, Allah is oft-forgiving, Most Merciful. And fight them on until there is no more persecution. And the religion becomes Allah’s. But if they cease, Let there be no hostility except to those who practice oppression (2:190-3)

Therefore let those fight in the way of Allah, who sell this world’s life for the hereafter; and whoever fights in the way of Allah, then be he slain or be he victorious, We shall grant him a mighty reward (4:74).

And when the sacred months are passed, kill those who join other gods with God wherever ye shall find them; and seize them, besiege them, and lay wait for them with every kind of ambush: but if they shall convert, and observe prayer, and pay the obligatory alms, then let them go their way, for God is gracious, merciful (9:5)

Nor is there any encouragement within the Koran to tolerate those that don’t accept the delusion of Islam:

Thou seest many of them making friends with those who disbelieve. Surely ill for them is that which they themselves send on before them (5:80).

Jihad explains the few extremists that have “martyred” themselves by flying planes into skyscrapers, detonating themselves on trains, or those caught before they could detonate bombs in the United States and Europe. But the jihad that threatens to introduce Islam in staggering numbers across Europe is far more subtle than a suicide bomber. This jihad is playing on secular ideals and the cry for tolerance on the left in the wake of the more violent versions of jihad. The subtle version seeks to introduce Muslim practices and culture in the secular nations of Europe by changing laws and policies making it difficult for opposition to question, criticize or restrict Muslims. On the surface, it seems a good thing not to restrict someone based solely on their religious beliefs. But, looking a bit deeper, one sees more than a mere longing for religious equality. A recent outcry in the United States by the Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund (SALDEF) complains of new TSA requirements at airports to search large head-coverings that include cowboy hats, straw hats, turbans and berets. In particular, TSA security personnel can now pat down these types of headgear even if the metal detectors didn’t alert in order to check for non-metallic, dangerous items.

Pressure against government agencies in the United States has less impact, however, than in Europe, where Muslims have made it difficult to be critical or restrictive on their religious superstitions without being “hateful” or “discriminatory.” In Scotland, doctors and nurses at a hospital have been instructed not to eat in front of Muslim workers during Ramadan. Food trolleys are to be moved away from their sight and Muslim workers are to be given time to pray. This is an example of religious tolerance gone too far, but that isn’t the furthest reaches of what is desired by Muslims in Britain. Muslims there wanted a law passed that would essentially make it a crime to criticize or blaspheme Islam. What passed was apparently a “watered down” version which restricts “threatening” comments designed to incite others against a religious group. I suppose referring to Islam as a delusion responsible for violence and terrorism would ostensibly qualify as an illegal comment if made in public.

Islam is a presence in Europe that uses violence to influence both Muslims and non-Muslims. In France, radical Islam is being blamed for violence in hospitals –physicians have been assaulted by men for “touching” Muslim women during the course of examinations and Muslim men are demanding “virginity certificates” for young girls. Muslims are also attacking the police in Muslim neighborhoods with stones and Molotov cocktails. For his efforts in documenting the nature of Muslim violence against Muslim women, Theo Van Gogh paid with his life. Upon completion of the 10 minute film, Van Gogh received death threats. On Nov. 2, 2004, the threats were carried out by a Muslim, deluded by superstitions of jihad and his holy duty to his god. In 2006, riots broke out across the Muslim world in response to cartoons depicting Mohammed published in a Danish newspaper. People died. Over cartoons. In an effort to appease Muslims, much has been done by non-Muslims in the West to present an air of tolerance, which is just what Muslims want. Tolerance is a step towards acceptance. Once Islam becomes as accepted as any other religious superstition, there would be less opposition to conversion. And in the largely secular Europe, Islam might well fill a void and experience little real opposition compared to that in the United States.

But it’s interesting to note that the very non-Muslims (theists and atheists alike) who called for “respect” and “tolerance” for Islam in the wake of the cartoon riots had little to say about the riots that ensued. Didn’t they notice that this “religion of peace” was both threatening and carrying out violence, primarily because some of the cartoons they objected to depicted Islam as violent? The irony is deep.

Islam expects tolerance for their delusions. The Koran dictates that those unbelievers that accept them can live, particularly if they convert. Those that refuse to accept them must die.

11 Responses

  1. I enjoyed your article. The dangers of Islam are too little understood.

    Alathea Faraday

  2. Muslims seek to dominate the world—> I heard it only from (bad) media publication, moslem people never notice it on Islam.

    Never thinks that Mawlana Abul Alla Mawdudi, the founder of Pakistan’s fundamentalist movement said is true and essence of Islam, because not all Moslem are true Moslem, we have to see people through the inside not the outside.

    “jihad” simply means “struggle”—> it’s true, but the best jihad is struggling from doing the bad and evil things.

    It’s a rational things if someone show surah only a part then the reader will get wrong meaning, then mostly lead to misunderstand. let me give you little example:

    1. US attacking Iraq, the Iraq people struggling
    2. Iraq people killing many US army
    3. Then destroy American base in Iraq

    if you only show part 2, it will be Iraq is bad guy. If you only show part 3 then it like command to destroy American Base. If you show part 2 and 3 then Iraq people is bad-ass. Your explanation is like that, very confused.

    Fight in the cause of Allah–> it means not fight for self-profit like expanding teritory or controlling oil.

    On Islam, there is no command or duty for convert the other belief to Islam. Most of converted people are converting itself, not being converted.
    “For you your religion, and for me my religion”(Al Kafirun 109-6)–> it’s clearly makes Islam will not and never disturb other religion.

    War for Islam only be a last choice, and only if attacked. In Iraq, the war is happen because American attack, Iraqi people only struggle to keep their country. But, media once again judge the wrong people to be a bad people. How if your country is attacked, would you stand still and accept it? How is your feeling if you protecting your country, but judge by media as the bad guy?

    It wise to say the bad is not the religion, but the person itself.

  3. If all who are deluded by Islamic superstitions were as moderate as you, then there would be little for me to criticize. That isn’t the case, however. Not by a long shot. Many, many Muslims read a different interpretation of Sharia, the Koran, and the Hadith. An interpretation such that they feel a duty to either kill non-believers and critics or they align themselves with those that do.

    See my upcoming article which I’ll post today for more response to the so-called “moderate Muslim” argument. I’ll post a link in this comment thread as soon as its up.

  4. [...] The Threat of Theocracy: Islam and World Domination (Previous Post) [...]

  5. An interpretation such that they feel a duty to either kill non-believers and critics or they align themselves with those that do. —> muslim people that i know never (will never) think that why, and mostly get confused with that. From where and since when it was like that? And makes conclusion that it was intrepretation of some uncomplete Muslim individual that proclaimed them as extrimist Muslim (mostly from Iran, i think).

    For many long time, i seen that more the person know Islam, the more better he/she will be(patient, keep their word, loving, caring, not cocky, happy, forgiving, good manner e.t.c).I conclude that kind of “extrimist muslim” not truly understand about Islam, and take a wrong way to learn Islam. So, please never say all muslim are like that (although you had said moderete), it’s hurts you know.

    We thinks media publication now is really evil and not fair, they can makes good guy look like bad guy and opposite thing.

  6. I have heard it said that Islam is a “sick and evil ideology”. That is a judgment I am not qualified to make; but it has the “feel” of truth. I believe that Islam is a perfect predator of ideologies. No quarter given to any other ideology. To survive Islam predators, we will have to learn how to run scared, or fight this predator. I do not know how this will be done. If it is not done, then I predict eventual World domination by Islam before it burns itself out through internal sectarian strife. After this is all over, the world will be a much different place; but after that, whoever survives will eventually throw this predator off, once and for all. In the end Allah cannot survive. That is the fate of perfect predators, like smallpox, or the Black death.

  7. Just quoteing scriptures out of context dosent make u wise my brother, Because jesus & all ur other prophets & ur demi god is Fucked by allaha, this religiion of truth will prevail & will destory the people like of U..sooner or later…Islam has grown 286% in past fifty yrs compared to christianity which is 47% Islam has the answere to all the world problems….”Ye men of inequaity” said by ur so called jesus

  8. I believe you Neo — except for the “answer to all the world problems” part.

  9. [...] “The Threat of Theocracy:Islam and World Domination Posted on December 9, 2007 by ylooshi [...]

  10. I hope science develops to the point we could find planets in outer galaxies n take our individual faiths there . Earth isn’t gonna lasts Long with such craziness ..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: