Over the course of the past month or so, I’ve read many different blogs in the “atheosphere” and ended up “starring” several in my Google Reader. I also had this graphic that I played around with creating in Photoshop and wanted to find a creative way to share it, so here’s the links the blog posts I found interesting or worth reading closely and the pic -magazine style. I hope someone else discovers an new blog or a post they missed. If you like what I’ve put together or the picture above, I’ll include a link to the photo sans text at the end of this post.
The Intersection of Science and Religion
Pharyngula has a post and a subsequent thread of comments (when does PZ *not* get a thread of comments!) discussing Texas’ consideration of accrediting the Institution of Creation Research for training teachers in Are we tired of Texas inanity yet? As a citizen (temporarily) of Texas and as a college graduate there, I have to say I find this a disappointment as do many. My elected officials will certainly be hearing from me and, hopefully, others.
Religion is scientifically examined all the time, which refutes the Non-Overlapping Magisteria hypothesis posited by the late Stephen J. Gould. At The Information Paradox, you can read a brief synopsis of how a Study shows younger generations are more skeptical of Christianity. The author cites a Barna Research Group study conducted in September. I’ll have to review that study and put the data up on the data page.
The Teen Atheist has a moving blog entry about her struggles with theistic parents and going to college at Diary of a Teen Atheist. I found her post genuine and heartfelt and it was easy to empathize with her situation if only because she expresses it so well.
Hemant, the Friendly Atheist, has an open thread for Questions for Atheists that’s directed at his theistic readers. This promises to be an interesting thread that I’ll follow the next few days. Already one commenters have asked: “Where can I find an atheist book, website, magazine, etc. that doesn’t mock or attack or deride religious people or beliefs, but only puts forth a positive vision of what it is to be an atheist?” and, “what is the one thing you would like Christians to understand about you?”
De-Conversion has two great posts with the heading “Challenging Religious Myths”. The first is No Morality Without Religion. This post does a very good job of refuting arguments like, “without God, people have no reason to behave” and “morality comes from religion or God.” The second post is Atheism is Just Another Religion in which the author dispels the notion put forward by a lot of religious apologists that atheism, particularly with the recent flood of atheist bestsellers, is a religion in a kind of tu quoque argument. I’ve always looked at this as a tacit acknowledgment by believers that there is something to be ashamed of in being part of a religious dogma.
Along the same line of D-C’s articles, Debunking Christianity has Do Non-Believers Willfully Refuse to Believe? I can’t count the times I’ve been faced with the argument from Christian apologists that I’m not simply without God, but that God is available to me yet I deny God and just refuse to believe in the way someone refuses to believe in the holocaust or a round Earth.
In An Open Letter to Heather, Possummomma (aka, Atheist in a min van) responds to one of her readers who happens to be a Christian but can’t seem to not read P-momma’s blog. While P-momma is an excellent writer, I suspect Heather’s stay has more to do with curiosity about atheism, atheist families, and how is it that atheists can actually be good, caring people with strong family values. This is contrary to what many Christians are taught throughout their lives and is a consistent point of contention in the so-called “culture war” between the godless and the godful.
Vjack at Atheist Revolution writes about the separation of church and state in I Value Truth as well as his thoughts on an article written by Steven Conn, a professor of history at Ohio State University who criticizes Mitt Romney’s recent speech -Romney attempting to appeal to the religious right.
Secular Planet doesn’t hold the punches on dealing with Santa Claus in Santa Claus: A Web of White Lies in which the author discusses his discontent with teaching kids about Santa during Christmas. I’m not sure I’m in total agreement, but the post was interesting. Personally, I’m planning on using the whole Santa Claus thing as an exercise in skepticism. I want to watch my little skeptic (6 yrs old now) come to the conclusion that the big guy is fake on her own. That and my wife would kill me if I told her now.
Daylight Atheism, a must-read stop in the atheosphere has a couple of posts about the “War on Christmas:” in The Real Enemies of Christmas he looks at the Puritan ban on Christmas celebration in the 1600s, putting the whole O’Reilly-esque whining about the “war on xmas” in perspective. Then, with How Not to Fight the War on Christmas he offers some fair criticism of liberal apologists that are a bit “wishy-washy” in their attempts “to stop using Christmas as an excuse to bash nonbelievers and assert their supremacy, and instead join in an effort to promote social justice.” Their stand against the religious right is “well intentioned,” says Ebon, but they’re not vocal and forthright enough against the bigots and loudmouths of the religious right.
You can always count on Austin Cline to have the latest topic being discussed in the atheosphere on his Austin’s Atheist Blog at About.com. He has probably more articles on “war on Christmas” topic than any single blog on the net: Taking Christmas out of Christianity; Don’t Believe in Jesus? No Christmas Party for You! ; Christmas Wars as Tribal Conflict ; and, one of my favorite articles on the topic of Christmas (in the atheosphere) is Joy Stephenson: Don’t Dare Wish Me a Happy Holidays!
Morality, Good and Evil
Richard Dawkins wrote an essay at Newsweek’s OnFaith blog titled Logical Path from Religious Beliefs to Evil Deeds in which he explores, well, the logical path of evil enabled by religious belief whereas there isn’t one with atheism. This is a topic I’m always very interested in exploring since one of the first arguments religious apologists use against atheism is the tired and fallacious “Stalin, Pol Pot, Hitler were atheists; therefore atheism is evil” argument. If you haven’t subscribed to the RSS feed for OnFaith, you really should at least visit and check it out.
Yet another article from Pharyngula discusses a study that found that atheists and people without religious affiliation were the least likely to be prejudiced against minorities or immigrants. Click on Bad news: atheists can be good people (and find out what this is “bad news”) to read more.
Myths of Atheism
The Jesus Myth has a post that refutes a few of the myths that Christians seem to have about atheists in Hate: A Four Letter Word.
Feeding the Fish, a blog I hadn’t previously known about until I noticed it in the Planet Atheism feed, has a post On Militant Atheists in which he echoes some of my own thoughts and feelings about the term “militant” as applied to atheism. It gets used frequently by religious apologists to describe their outspoken critics, but militant, when applied to atheism conjures a far different image than when it’s applied to “Islam” or “Christianity.” And the author of Feeding the Fish has the pictures to prove it!
Here’s the pic above without the magazine text & barcode. The Latin phrase means, “fortune is glass; just when it gleams brightest it shatters.” I don’t know if anyone would like to use it, but feel free if you’d like. I just ask that you link back to me with a credit.