<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Breaking Spells</title>
	<atom:link href="http://breakingspells.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://breakingspells.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 02:13:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on New Domain for Breaking Spells by GeorgeRic</title>
		<link>http://breakingspells.wordpress.com/2008/08/22/new-domain-for-breaking-spells/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>GeorgeRic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 02:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://breakingspells.wordpress.com/?p=159#comment-600</guid>
		<description>How great it is to find a blog of people who are honestly looking for answers.  You people see only what is material; lots of Christian ideas are out of this world (and help us to live better in this world).  Plato in his &#039;Allegory of the Cave&#039; started it.  Abbott, writer of &#039;Flatland&#039;, described contiguous  dimensional worlds.  &#039;Techie Worlds&#039;, available at Amazon.com, analyzes in a mechanistic sort of way. It looks at Christian concepts like Trinity, resurrection, judgment, soul, Satan and hell.  Viewed dimensionally, those ideas make logical sense.  That follows the pattern of science:  examine phenomena in the light of a theory.  When phenomena become more understandable, accept that theory.
	Throughout history mankind has experienced strange ideas and events:  Wicca, Greek gods, Hindu pantheism, upturned corners on oriental temples, the sun dancing at Fatima.  Materialists just deny them all.  &#039;Techie Worlds&#039;, with its geometric understanding of  worlds contiguous with ours, explains the structure of our real worlds.  It is not accepted by bible thumpers and professional religious.  They have faith.  Instead it serves thinkers who are  able to integrate sensible ideas.
GeorgeRic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How great it is to find a blog of people who are honestly looking for answers.  You people see only what is material; lots of Christian ideas are out of this world (and help us to live better in this world).  Plato in his &#8216;Allegory of the Cave&#8217; started it.  Abbott, writer of &#8216;Flatland&#8217;, described contiguous  dimensional worlds.  &#8216;Techie Worlds&#8217;, available at Amazon.com, analyzes in a mechanistic sort of way. It looks at Christian concepts like Trinity, resurrection, judgment, soul, Satan and hell.  Viewed dimensionally, those ideas make logical sense.  That follows the pattern of science:  examine phenomena in the light of a theory.  When phenomena become more understandable, accept that theory.<br />
	Throughout history mankind has experienced strange ideas and events:  Wicca, Greek gods, Hindu pantheism, upturned corners on oriental temples, the sun dancing at Fatima.  Materialists just deny them all.  &#8216;Techie Worlds&#8217;, with its geometric understanding of  worlds contiguous with ours, explains the structure of our real worlds.  It is not accepted by bible thumpers and professional religious.  They have faith.  Instead it serves thinkers who are  able to integrate sensible ideas.<br />
GeorgeRic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Need for Absurd Belief Among Fundamentalists by salient</title>
		<link>http://breakingspells.wordpress.com/2008/08/11/the-need-for-absurd-belief-among-fundamentalists/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>salient</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://breakingspells.wordpress.com/?p=135#comment-599</guid>
		<description>&quot;&quot;Eventually, perhaps, the spell of religion will be broken.&quot;&quot;

Let&#039;s hope! Religion continues to support damaging and outright dangerous cognitive and behavioural disorders.

I completely agree that fundies are terrified of knowledge -- whether it&#039;s science or the expert conclusions of biblical scholars. I also agree that this rigid thinking is the result of childhood indoctrination. Why else would IDiots be fighting to insinuate creationism into science curricula?

I think that the motivation is not merely habit -- it is highly emotional. It is also deliberately anti-factual, and, most important, illogical. They are trained into illogic and this fallacious thinking is reinforced by Bible quotes.

Successful religions have set up clever reward and punishment systems. Community is the most mundane, but is probably essential for many. An eternal afterlife with a loving SkyDaddy who punishes one&#039;s enemies is an obvious incentive. The flip side is the prison door. They fear what they are instructed to fear.

However, based on long observation of how fundies think, I conclude that much of the emotional appeal lies in certainty and the assurance that rule-following renders one RIGHT and morally SUPERIOR. (Excuse the caps. They seemed appropriate.)

It always reminds me of prefects in a school playground. Not a highschool playground. Not a primary school playground in North America. No, a school playground for children up to age 11. That&#039;s the moral level at which these authoritarianism-oriented folk function.

Ugh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8221;Eventually, perhaps, the spell of religion will be broken.&#8221;"</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope! Religion continues to support damaging and outright dangerous cognitive and behavioural disorders.</p>
<p>I completely agree that fundies are terrified of knowledge &#8212; whether it&#8217;s science or the expert conclusions of biblical scholars. I also agree that this rigid thinking is the result of childhood indoctrination. Why else would IDiots be fighting to insinuate creationism into science curricula?</p>
<p>I think that the motivation is not merely habit &#8212; it is highly emotional. It is also deliberately anti-factual, and, most important, illogical. They are trained into illogic and this fallacious thinking is reinforced by Bible quotes.</p>
<p>Successful religions have set up clever reward and punishment systems. Community is the most mundane, but is probably essential for many. An eternal afterlife with a loving SkyDaddy who punishes one&#8217;s enemies is an obvious incentive. The flip side is the prison door. They fear what they are instructed to fear.</p>
<p>However, based on long observation of how fundies think, I conclude that much of the emotional appeal lies in certainty and the assurance that rule-following renders one RIGHT and morally SUPERIOR. (Excuse the caps. They seemed appropriate.)</p>
<p>It always reminds me of prefects in a school playground. Not a highschool playground. Not a primary school playground in North America. No, a school playground for children up to age 11. That&#8217;s the moral level at which these authoritarianism-oriented folk function.</p>
<p>Ugh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Witchcraft: Taken Very Seriously in Africa by ADEAGBO OLUWAFEMI ATANDA</title>
		<link>http://breakingspells.wordpress.com/2008/01/06/witchcraft-taken-very-seriously-in-africa/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>ADEAGBO OLUWAFEMI ATANDA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://breakingspells.wordpress.com/2008/01/06/witchcraft-taken-very-seriously-in-africa/#comment-597</guid>
		<description>witchcraft is an ethical as well as an epistemological issue that requires immediate attention.witchcraft has its major influence in africa where the belief is majorly rooted.For instance,a case was reported in Nigeria last week that 140 children were bewitched by an american man and these children caused alot of havocs in the society.so many childrens have been killed and some have been displaced because of accusation of being a witch.My questions are thus--is there any scientific explanation of this concept?who are the witches?where do they get their power from?where is their meeting point?are those involved free or determined by external factors? we have seen so many cases of accusing someone as a witch and the person will not know anything about it.Besides,why is the issue of witchcraft not spread in developed countries as it is in africa?dont you think poverty brings about this concept?To me,some of the children that were accused of witchcraft are sometimes forced to say what they never did. Lets look att witchcraft from another point of view...can we say there is nothing like witches?just because we do not see SOUND but believe its existence,can we believe the existence of witches too? these questions are begging for answers that will convince me enough on these subject matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>witchcraft is an ethical as well as an epistemological issue that requires immediate attention.witchcraft has its major influence in africa where the belief is majorly rooted.For instance,a case was reported in Nigeria last week that 140 children were bewitched by an american man and these children caused alot of havocs in the society.so many childrens have been killed and some have been displaced because of accusation of being a witch.My questions are thus&#8211;is there any scientific explanation of this concept?who are the witches?where do they get their power from?where is their meeting point?are those involved free or determined by external factors? we have seen so many cases of accusing someone as a witch and the person will not know anything about it.Besides,why is the issue of witchcraft not spread in developed countries as it is in africa?dont you think poverty brings about this concept?To me,some of the children that were accused of witchcraft are sometimes forced to say what they never did. Lets look att witchcraft from another point of view&#8230;can we say there is nothing like witches?just because we do not see SOUND but believe its existence,can we believe the existence of witches too? these questions are begging for answers that will convince me enough on these subject matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Creationists Baffled: Why do their &#8220;Facts&#8221; Get Shot Down in Forums? by GodKillzYou</title>
		<link>http://breakingspells.wordpress.com/2008/05/24/creationists-baffled/#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>GodKillzYou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://breakingspells.wordpress.com/?p=87#comment-596</guid>
		<description>Precisely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Precisely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Creationists Baffled: Why do their &#8220;Facts&#8221; Get Shot Down in Forums? by GodKillzYou</title>
		<link>http://breakingspells.wordpress.com/2008/05/24/creationists-baffled/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>GodKillzYou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://breakingspells.wordpress.com/?p=87#comment-595</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t understand what the word &quot;theory&quot; means, do you? I suppose we should just ditch the &quot;theory of gravity&quot; as well? Or is that too inconvenient for you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t understand what the word &#8220;theory&#8221; means, do you? I suppose we should just ditch the &#8220;theory of gravity&#8221; as well? Or is that too inconvenient for you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Atheist Soldier Threatened -a Veteran&#8217;s Opinion by David</title>
		<link>http://breakingspells.wordpress.com/2007/12/06/atheist-soldier-threatened-a-veterans-opinion/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://breakingspells.wordpress.com/2007/12/06/atheist-soldier-threatened-a-veterans-opinion/#comment-594</guid>
		<description>There are some glowing inacuracies in this article.

1st Chaplain&#039;s do no aprove Religious or Non-Religious programs.  

That is the Commanders.  That is why the Chaplain&#039;s program is called the CMRP (Commanders Master Religious Program).

If the Major was in command at that time he was well within the responsibilities of his command to cut the meeting.

2nd  Not that he needs to be a DFGL but AR 165-1 Ch 5 section 5 requires a great deal more then that to be classified as a Faith Group Leader.  1st and formost they have to be recognized by a group as their proponet.

http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r165_1.pdf

I cannot speak to the supposed &quot;forced&quot; participation I don&#039;t have enough info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some glowing inacuracies in this article.</p>
<p>1st Chaplain&#8217;s do no aprove Religious or Non-Religious programs.  </p>
<p>That is the Commanders.  That is why the Chaplain&#8217;s program is called the CMRP (Commanders Master Religious Program).</p>
<p>If the Major was in command at that time he was well within the responsibilities of his command to cut the meeting.</p>
<p>2nd  Not that he needs to be a DFGL but AR 165-1 Ch 5 section 5 requires a great deal more then that to be classified as a Faith Group Leader.  1st and formost they have to be recognized by a group as their proponet.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r165_1.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r165_1.pdf</a></p>
<p>I cannot speak to the supposed &#8220;forced&#8221; participation I don&#8217;t have enough info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Give me a child until he is seven and I will give you the man by ktididit</title>
		<link>http://breakingspells.wordpress.com/2008/01/01/give-me-a-child-until-he-is-seven-and-i-will-give-you-the-man/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>ktididit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://breakingspells.wordpress.com/2008/01/01/give-me-a-child-until-he-is-seven-and-i-will-give-you-the-man/#comment-593</guid>
		<description>I have always admired that quote... but after some years of living, learning, and finding my niche in life, I wonder if St. Francis Xavior was not being a bit simplistic.  

I was the child of a divorced mom who had only an 8th grade education (and I came late to realize that she is one of the wisest people I have known).  For as far back as I can remember (age 3? 4?) she said I must get a college education.  In that aspect, certainly, the Jesuits are correct.

From her, though, I have also learned that book larnin&#039; isn&#039;t the whole answer (though it helps reading copiously can do the same job).  Mom was no feminist; just a gentle, wise, and loving person who taught me the most just by being the kind of person she was.

We all cannot escape being products of our genetics, our environments, whether human or nature (odd to make a difference in that huh!), but even more... I believe we are products of something else which is uniquely ours... unique to each and every human since homo erectus and perhaps before... 

At least to this day, in spite of breeding and inbreeding, science does not claim that any living thing is a natural  clone of any other.  OK... so, if we accept that each of us is instilled at conception with a quality that has not been precisely duplicated... we have to realize we do possess that hackneyed word: we are special.

And one other thing we have, and this is legendary in most cultures:  we have free will IF we choose... and that choice in itself prooves that premise.

And so perhaps, like me, others reading this might recall the clusters of things that shaped us, what we are today.  Or, are not.

St. Francis was a wise man, but, I hope without offending, I believe that those first seven years are indeed vital.. but they are only stepping stones.  The real man or woman is what we choose to make of oneself across the divide to and through adulthood.  

Most of us can&#039;t help avoid skidding on one or two of the wet stones and go plop :) but we don&#039;t just stay there; we can&#039;t.  Getting up is what we do, figuring which stone to avoid next time.   We might make waves... let them be the best waves we can make because they are our waves.  Let them do us proud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always admired that quote&#8230; but after some years of living, learning, and finding my niche in life, I wonder if St. Francis Xavior was not being a bit simplistic.  </p>
<p>I was the child of a divorced mom who had only an 8th grade education (and I came late to realize that she is one of the wisest people I have known).  For as far back as I can remember (age 3? 4?) she said I must get a college education.  In that aspect, certainly, the Jesuits are correct.</p>
<p>From her, though, I have also learned that book larnin&#8217; isn&#8217;t the whole answer (though it helps reading copiously can do the same job).  Mom was no feminist; just a gentle, wise, and loving person who taught me the most just by being the kind of person she was.</p>
<p>We all cannot escape being products of our genetics, our environments, whether human or nature (odd to make a difference in that huh!), but even more&#8230; I believe we are products of something else which is uniquely ours&#8230; unique to each and every human since homo erectus and perhaps before&#8230; </p>
<p>At least to this day, in spite of breeding and inbreeding, science does not claim that any living thing is a natural  clone of any other.  OK&#8230; so, if we accept that each of us is instilled at conception with a quality that has not been precisely duplicated&#8230; we have to realize we do possess that hackneyed word: we are special.</p>
<p>And one other thing we have, and this is legendary in most cultures:  we have free will IF we choose&#8230; and that choice in itself prooves that premise.</p>
<p>And so perhaps, like me, others reading this might recall the clusters of things that shaped us, what we are today.  Or, are not.</p>
<p>St. Francis was a wise man, but, I hope without offending, I believe that those first seven years are indeed vital.. but they are only stepping stones.  The real man or woman is what we choose to make of oneself across the divide to and through adulthood.  </p>
<p>Most of us can&#8217;t help avoid skidding on one or two of the wet stones and go plop <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  but we don&#8217;t just stay there; we can&#8217;t.  Getting up is what we do, figuring which stone to avoid next time.   We might make waves&#8230; let them be the best waves we can make because they are our waves.  Let them do us proud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is the United States a Christian Nation by Lisa M</title>
		<link>http://breakingspells.wordpress.com/2008/08/09/is-the-united-states-a-christian-nation/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 00:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://breakingspells.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-583</guid>
		<description>No matter what lengths the Christian right go to-- in a fruitless attempt to prove the USA  a &quot;Christian nation&quot;, it still doesn&#039;t change the historical fact that Jesus from Nazareth was the ultimate LIBERAL Radical. Gotta love the irony in that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter what lengths the Christian right go to&#8211; in a fruitless attempt to prove the USA  a &#8220;Christian nation&#8221;, it still doesn&#8217;t change the historical fact that Jesus from Nazareth was the ultimate LIBERAL Radical. Gotta love the irony in that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Atheists on Twitter? by godlessgirl</title>
		<link>http://breakingspells.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/atheists-on-twitter/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>godlessgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://breakingspells.wordpress.com/?p=76#comment-581</guid>
		<description>Old post, but I&#039;m bumping it! I&#039;m also on twitter:
http://twitter.com/godlessgirl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old post, but I&#8217;m bumping it! I&#8217;m also on twitter:<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/godlessgirl" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/godlessgirl</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Atheist Soldier Threatened -a Veteran&#8217;s Opinion by Avertedd</title>
		<link>http://breakingspells.wordpress.com/2007/12/06/atheist-soldier-threatened-a-veterans-opinion/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>Avertedd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 06:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://breakingspells.wordpress.com/2007/12/06/atheist-soldier-threatened-a-veterans-opinion/#comment-576</guid>
		<description>Спасибо, хорошая статья. Подписался.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Спасибо, хорошая статья. Подписался.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
